Comments on: Google Caffeine Update, An SEO Insight

By: Sangam Kumar

Sangam Kumar — Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:38:00 +0000

I like your comment too and I want to participate in your community thanks: brain teaser games

By: Hubert Gregori

Hubert Gregori — Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:06:44 +0000

What a great concept. I’ll subscribe to your RSS.

By: Gordon

Gordon — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:43:22 +0000

Thanks for the info. Used it!

By: Jon Everill

Jon Everill — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:57:03 +0000

Using the excellent comparecaffeine.com tool I have noticed a significant improvement in my UK serps position for targeted keywords. Remember that caffeine is only showing up intermittently on the datacentre so you might need to refresh a couple of times.

By: Goeplo

Goeplo — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:28:44 +0000

thanks for information

very helpfull

By: Mike Standing

Mike Standing — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:44:37 +0000

I think not too many changes would be seen over the net, even after Google fully completes installing the new update. Since some years ago Google has been working on its algorithm to making that better.

By: Duncan

Duncan — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:12:18 +0000

It can be seen at this ip: 209.85.225.103 – at least some of the time
Though it’s not a new “algo”, as I understand it – but more of a faster infrastructure.
Though I see some disparity in SERP’s.

By: JND

JND — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:48:08 +0000

SEO’s will haved a new factor when it comes to optimisation now as site speed is now a ranking factor included in the caffeine update-this means all you seo’s out there get your clients sites jscript, css, images optimised to the fastest they can be. Some server side scripts may need to be altered to optimise for information delivery. e.g. php scripts that parse xml feeds or output buffering (pre output) wastes time at server end.

Might even be worth upgrading to quicker servers where the site is hosted-every little helps and if it is something that we know directly influences the SERP’s then its worth doing in my book.

By: mark rushworth

mark rushworth — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:04:23 +0000

Sucks for static sites tho. i am now recomending businesses have a /blog wordpress blog instead of sub domain and/or external domain name and have the feed listed on their homepage using simplepie or some similar script to help the sites appear as fresh.

whats peoples thoughts on randomising content to make the site appear fresh?

By: Joseph

Joseph — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:56:32 +0000

comparegoogle.com has been helpful in finding difference in search results for the two algorithms. Just put in some keywords and see what changed. Could be helpful for SEO engineers.