The White Hat vs. Black Hat Debate

One of the most controversial statements made at the recently concluded SES London convention was that Black Hat SEO methods are the wave of the future. Forget all the rules of online optimization and paid search. White Hat methods are fast becoming a thing of the past. For those of you who don’t know the distinction between the two (and how could you not if you’re into SEO?), White Hat marketing methods are considered those which are fairly safe, unobtrusive and, most of all, legal. Black Hat methods on the other hand, while not all illegal, can result in severe penalties from search engines.

One example of a White Hat method would be designing a number of content rich sites and having them all link to each other. A Black Hat method is having multiple landing pages which all point to your homepage. This is done in order to boost the number of inbound links, and therefore the page rank. Is it effective? Undoubtedly it is, and it’s the fastest way to get a bunch of links coming to your site. The problem is that if the search engine finds out that your landing pages are devoid of any real value they can drop your site like a hot potato, and even blacklist you.

Maybe the answer lies in finding a common ground between the two. After all, there’s a loophole to practically anything. There must be some way of merging the effective Black Hat methods with the acceptable White Hat methods.

About Musa Aykac

Musa is the founder of SEOTops and has been in the internet marketing industry since a young age.
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://fantomaster.com.au Samuel Symes

    Most link building by most SEO firms is not “natural” and is in fact blackhat according to Google. If you have to pay for it, ask for it, comment for it or insert a link in your article to gain it, then you are manipulating Google search results and Google terms that as blackhat. You just need to view the many video’s by Matt Cutts to realize that if you are doing any of the above, then you are creating links manually and violating Google’s TOS.

    It simply baffles me how many SEO experts will quickly denounce Cloaking as “unethical” or against Google’s TOS or even label it as spam which manipulates search results but then on a daily basis create artificial, manual or software generated backlinks for clients.

    If you are distributing countless articles with links or posting on blogs/forums to obtain backlinks or using automated backlinking software, isn’t that also spamming to manipulate search engine results?

    What is the difference? It all violates Google’s TOS.

    There is also a silly mindset that whitehat SEO is risk free and blackhat is full of risks. Really? How many whitehat sites, that supposedly conformed to all of Google’s TOS, suddenly lose their ranking and all their business when Google decides to do a major algorithm update? Ha! Where is the reward for loyalty from Google?

    So does “blackhat” or being “unethical” really exist anymore? Isn’t this really about traffic, conversions and surviving within an ever tightening monopoly created by Google for which we now are left with few other options, unless to line the pockets of Google shareholders.